Tilbake
til første side
Søk på GOLFSIDEN
Les mer Her er
DEBATTSIDEN
30.07 Til ettertanke:
Tom Watson gjorde et sterkt
inntrykk i The Open
Det er ikke gått upåaktet hen, selv i New York Times. Her har den meget kjente
og populære journalisten Tom Friedman skrevet en artikkel som kan være verdt å
lese for noen og enhver.
Artikkelen er hentet fra New York Times og sto på trykk 29. juli 2009. Den kan
du lese og få noe å tenke på.
Her er artikkelen:
59 Is the New 30
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Last April I took a break to caddy for the former U.S. Open champion Andy North
when he teamed up with Tom Watson to defend their title in the two-man Liberty
Mutual Legends of Golf tournament in Savannah, Ga. So it was with more than a
casual spectator’s interest that I watched in awe on Armed Forces television
from Afghanistan as Watson made his amazing run at winning the British Open at
age 59. Watson likes to talk about foreign affairs more than golf. So to let
him know just how many people wanted him to win, I e-mailed him before the
final round: “Even the Taliban are rooting for you.”
Indeed, I have been struck at how many golfers and non-golfers got caught up in
Watson’s historic performance — tying for the lead after four rounds at
Turnberry, but losing in a playoff to the 36-year-old Stewart Cink. I was not
alone in being devastated that Watson was not able to par the last hole and
clinch the win. Like millions of others, I shouted at the TV as his ball ran
across the 18th green — heading for trouble — “STOP! STOP! STOP!” as if I
personally had something at stake. Why was that?
Many reasons. For starters, Watson’s run was freaky unusual — a 59-year-old man
who had played his opening two rounds in this tournament with a 16-year-old
Italian amateur — was able to best the greatest golfers in the world at least a
decade after anyone would have dreamt it possible. Watching this happen
actually widened our sense of what any of us is capable of. That is, when Kobe
Bryant scores 70 points, we are in awe. When Tiger Woods wins by 15 strokes, we
are in awe. But when a man our own age and size whips the world’s best — who
are half his age — we identify.
Of course, Watson has unique golfing skills, but if you are a baby boomer you
could not help but look at him and say something you would never say about
Tiger or Kobe: “He’s my age; he’s my build; he’s my height; and he even had his
hip replaced like me. If he can do that, maybe I can do something like that,
too.”
Neil Oxman, Watson’s caddy, who is a top Democratic political consultant in his
real life, told me: “After Thursday’s round with Tom, when we left the scoring
tent I said to him, ‘You know, this is a thing.’ He understood what I meant. On
Sunday morning, the two of us were in the corner of the locker room without
another human being around, sitting in these two easy chairs facing each other
behind a partition. We were chatting about stuff, and I said to him, ‘For a lot
of people, what you’re doing is life-affirming.’ I took it from a story about
when Betty Comden and Adolph Green — the writers of “Singin’ in the Rain” —
showed Leonard Bernstein the famous scene of Gene Kelly. Bernstein said to them,
‘That scene is an affirmation of life.’ What Tom did last week was an
affirmation of life.”
Also, as Watson himself appreciates, the way he lost the tournament underscored
why golf is the sport most like life. He hit two perfect shots on the 18th hole
in the final round, and the second one bounced just a little too hard and ran
through the green, leaving him a difficult chip back, which he was unable to
get up and down. Had his ball stopped a foot shorter, he would have had an easy
two-putt and a win.
That’s the point. Baseball, basketball and football are played on flat surfaces
designed to give true bounces. Golf is played on an uneven terrain designed to
surprise. Good and bad bounces are built into the essence of the game. And the
reason golf is so much like life is that the game — like life — is all about
how you react to those good and bad bounces. Do you blame your caddy? Do you
cheat? Do you throw your clubs? Or do you accept it all with dignity and grace
and move on, as Watson always has. Hence the saying: Play one round of golf
with someone and you will learn everything you need to know about his character.
Golf is all about individual character. The ball is fixed. No one throws it to
you. You initiate the swing, and you alone have to live with the results. There
are no teammates to blame or commiserate with. Also, pro golfers, unlike
baseball, football or basketball players, have no fixed salaries. They eat what
they kill. If they score well, they make money. If they don’t, they don’t make
money. I wonder what the average N.B.A. player’s free-throw shooting percentage
would be if he had to make free throws to get paid the way golfers have to make
three-foot putts?
This wonderful but cruel game never stops testing or teaching you. “The only
comment I can make,” Watson told me after, “is one that the immortal Bobby
Jones related: ‘One learns from defeat, not from victory.’ I may never have the
chance again to beat the kids, but I took one thing from the last hole: hitting
both the tee shot and the approach shots exactly the way I meant to wasn’t good
enough. ... I had to finish.”
So Tom Watson got a brutal lesson in golf that he’ll never forget, but he gave
us all an incredible lesson in possibilities — one we’ll never forget.
Her er artikkelen slik den sto i NY Times med visse henvisninger:
Klikk her
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Her finner du
DEBATTSIDEN
Her diskuterer du golf
Si din mening!!
Leter du etter noe?
Søk på GOLFSIDEN etter noe du lurer på. Kanskje du finner det du søker på
tusenvis av Golfsiden-sider som ligger ute på nettet.
Les mer
Skal
du annonsere kjøp eller
salg av aksjer/spilleretter
eller brukt utstyr?
Skal du annonsere
selv?
KLIKK
HER
Tilbake
til første side
|